2015-08-06

2 more static site hosting solutions which are not

Today I realised that using Google Drive or Dropbox for static site hosting is probably no the best idea, as they don't support relative path and needs to hardcode each file dependencies in the html + there is not way to provide a custom a domain - so this should be reserved for the ad-hoc single-page site.

1 comment:

Royal Brixton said...

Well, I didn't knew about it until now that Google Drive or Dropbox for static site hosting is probably no the best idea like shared at https://inxy.hosting/ site as well. I really hope to read a lot more on this soon.